#Star wars rebellion map reusable for free

The fee for NeuroImage is below that of the nearest comparable journal in its field.” He said the company was “committed to advancing open-access research” and its article publishing charges were “below the market average relative to quality. By taking the entire set of editors across to start the new journal, we are taking the reputation with us.”Ī spokesperson for Elsevier said: “We value our editors very highly and are disappointed, especially as we have been engaging constructively with them over the last couple of years.” Researchers put up with it because they want to publish in established journals that will be widely read, he added.īut he warned publishers: “Enough is enough. Stephen Smith, professor of biomedical engineering at Oxford University and formerly editor-in-chief at Neuroimage, said: “Academics really don’t like the way things are, but individuals feel powerless to get the huge publishers to start behaving more ethically.”

Academics are then often charged thousands of pounds to have their work published in open-access journals, or universities will pay very high subscription charges.

#Star wars rebellion map reusable for free

They “peer review” each other’s work to verify it is worth publishing for free, and academic editors collate it for free or for a small stipend. The big scientific publishers keep costs low because academics write up their research – typically funded by charities and the public purse – for free. But it’s the profit margins, nearing 40%, according to its 2019 accounts, which anger academics most. That time is now.”Įlsevier, a Dutch company that claims to publish 18% of the world’s scientific papers, reported a 10% increase in its revenue to £2.9bn last year. The academic community can withdraw our consent to be exploited at any time. He told the Observer: “All Elsevier cares about is money and this will cost them a lot of money.

He has urged fellow scientists to turn their backs on the Elsevier journal and submit papers to a nonprofit open-access journal which the team is setting up instead. Professor Chris Chambers, head of brain stimulation at Cardiff University and one of the resigning team, said: “Elsevier preys on the academic community, claiming huge profits while adding little value to science.” The former editors say this is “unethical” and bears no relation to the costs involved. But its charges to authors reflect its prestige, and academics now pay over £2,700 for a research paper to be published. Neuroimage, the leading publication globally for brain-imaging research, is one of many journals that are now “open access” rather than sitting behind a subscription paywall. Academics around the world have applauded what many hope is the start of a rebellion against the huge profit margins in academic publishing, which outstrip those made by Apple, Google and Amazon.